Search

Categories

    • categories-img Jacket, Women
    • categories-img Woolend Jacket
    • categories-img Western denim
    • categories-img Mini Dresss
    • categories-img Jacket, Women
    • categories-img Woolend Jacket
    • categories-img Western denim
    • categories-img Mini Dresss
    • categories-img Jacket, Women
    • categories-img Woolend Jacket
    • categories-img Western denim
    • categories-img Mini Dresss
    • categories-img Jacket, Women
    • categories-img Woolend Jacket
    • categories-img Western denim
    • categories-img Mini Dresss
    • categories-img Jacket, Women
    • categories-img Woolend Jacket
    • categories-img Western denim
    • categories-img Mini Dresss

Filter By Price

$
-
$

Dietary Needs

Top Rated Product

product-img product-img

Modern Chair

$165.00
product-img product-img

Plastic Chair

$165.00
product-img product-img

Design Rooms

$165.00

Brands

  • Wooden
  • Chair
  • Modern
  • Fabric
  • Shoulder
  • Winter
  • Accessories
  • Dress

Welcome and thank you for visiting us. For any query call us on 0799 626 359 or Email [email protected]

Offcanvas Menu Open

Shopping Cart

Africa largest book store

Sub Total:

Search for any Title

Illegality after Patel v Mirza (Hart Studies in Private Law)

By: Alan Bogg (Edited by) , Sarah Green (Edited by)

Manufacture on Demand

Ksh 15,650.00

Format: Paperback or Softback

ISBN-10: 1509943595

ISBN-13: 9781509943593

Collection / Series: Hart Studies in Private Law

Collection Type: Publisher collection

Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC

Imprint: Hart Publishing

Country of Manufacture: GB

Country of Publication: GB

Publication Date: Oct 29th, 2020

Publication Status: Active

Product extent: 408 Pages

Weight: 616.00 grams

Dimensions (height x width x thickness): 15.40 x 23.40 x 2.30 cms

Product Classification / Subject(s): Restitution
Contract law
Equity & trusts
Torts / Delicts

Choose your Location

Shipping & Delivery

Door Delivery

Delivery fee

Delivery in 10 to 14 days

  • Description

  • Reviews

In Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, nine justices of the Supreme Court of England and Wales decided in favour of a restitutionary award in response to an unjust enrichment, despite the illegal transaction on which that enrichment was based. Whilst the result was reached unanimously, the reasoning could be said to have divided the Court. Lord Toulson, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Hodge and Lord Neuberger favoured a discretionary approach, but their mode of reasoning was described as ‘revolutionary’ by Lord Sumption (at [261]), who outlined in contrast a more rule-based means of dealing with the issue; a method with which Lord Mance and Lord Clarke broadly agreed. The decision is detailed and complex, and its implications for several areas of the law are considerable. Significantly, the reliance principle from Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340 has been discarded, as has the rule in Parkinson v College of Ambulance Ltd [1925] KB 1. Patel v Mirza, therefore, can fairly be described as one of the most important judgments in general private law for a generation, and it can be expected to have ramifications for the application of the illegality doctrine across a wide range of disciplinary areas. Unless there is legislative intervention, which does not seem likely at the present time, Patel v Mirza is set to be of enduring significance. This collection will provide a crucial set of theoretical and practical perspectives on the illegality defence in English private law. All of the authors are well established in their respective fields. The timing of the book means that it will be unusually well placed as the ‘go to’ work on this subject, for legal practitioners and for scholars.

In Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, nine justices of the Supreme Court of England and Wales decided in favour of a restitutionary award in response to an unjust enrichment, despite the illegal transaction on which that enrichment was based. Whilst the result was reached unanimously, the reasoning could be said to have divided the Court. Lord Toulson, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Hodge and Lord Neuberger favoured a discretionary approach, but their mode of reasoning was described as ‘revolutionary’ by Lord Sumption (at [261]), who outlined in contrast a more rule-based means of dealing with the issue; a method with which Lord Mance and Lord Clarke broadly agreed.

The decision is detailed and complex, and its implications for several areas of the law are considerable. Significantly, the reliance principle from Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340 has been discarded, as has the rule in Parkinson v College of Ambulance Ltd [1925] KB 1. Patel v Mirza, therefore, can fairly be described as one of the most important judgments in general private law for a generation, and it can be expected to have ramifications for the application of the illegality doctrine across a wide range of disciplinary areas. Unless there is legislative intervention, which does not seem likely at the present time, Patel v Mirza is set to be of enduring significance.

This collection will provide a crucial set of theoretical and practical perspectives on the illegality defence in English private law. All of the authors are well established in their respective fields. The timing of the book means that it will be unusually well placed as the ‘go to’ work on this subject, for legal practitioners and for scholars.


Get Illegality after Patel v Mirza by at the best price and quality guranteed only at Werezi Africa largest book ecommerce store. The book was published by Bloomsbury Publishing PLC and it has pages. Enjoy Shopping Best Offers & Deals on books Online from Werezi - Receive at your doorstep - Fast Delivery - Secure mode of Payment

Customer Reviews

Based on 0 reviews

Mind, Body, & Spirit