Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Presents an interpretative history of development and management studies and explains how non-governmental actors gradually acquired prominence as unique private actors capable of expert market-based solutions. It cautions against dismissing such actors but keeps a critical eye on their claims of expertise and representation.
What would development look like if its practitioners and scholars were ''against NGOs,'' challenging common sense about them? This book presents a critical perspective on NGOs, describing how they emerged as key agents of development over time. Through an interpretative history based on Gramscian concepts it shows how civil society organizations were gradually enlisted in development as non-state technocratic actors. The book argues that management studies and development studies emerged as commonsensical explanations for capitalist crises. Each offered complementary solutions to balance the needs of capital and society, in particular historical circumstances. These solutions also situated civil society as agents of development and vectors of management. Against NGOs fills a gap within the literature of management and development studies through its original discussion of their historical interconnections and shared themes. The book raises provocative questions on what forms of knowledge-politics can respond productively to the crises of our contemporary moment.
Get Against NGOs by at the best price and quality guranteed only at Werezi Africa largest book ecommerce store. The book was published by Cambridge University Press and it has pages. Enjoy Shopping Best Offers & Deals on books Online from Werezi - Receive at your doorstep - Fast Delivery - Secure mode of Payment
